Wbs chart pro mega
There is task information, and there is resource information.
#Wbs chart pro mega software#
All project management software is based on this protocol. It is very important to recognize this distinction. The other is the organization, and the resources that are going to accomplish the work. One is the work itself, consisting of the project(s) and the tasks that are to be accomplished within the project. There are two basic areas that are defied and managed. To set the stage for a clarification of these terms, and their use, it is important to establish a clear understanding of a basic premise of project data. In fact, I have found the terms to be used quite differently in two products being distributed by the same project management software vendor. The other thing to lookout for is varied use of the term OBS (see below). You will run into this situation primarily in the low-end product group, where the outline-based products are trying to appear to have WBS functionality.
#Wbs chart pro mega code#
In this case, the term WBS is really misapplied, as the field is nothing more than an auxiliary code field. But, look out! Occasionally, you will come across a WBS function wherein the WBS numbers are used solely as IDs, rather than summarization points. We would expect similar capabilities from a WBS. This is almost universally true, for all outliners. That is, we expect the project data to be able to be rolled-up to the various outline levels. Ordinarily, we would expect the outliner function to provide a summarization capability. But! These terms do not always mean the same thing. One of my clients referred to them as the Weebis, Obis, and Reebis (which, once you stop laughing, is easier to say). In order to facilitate frameworks for project plans (a very useful function), we have invented the WBS (Work Breakdown Structure), the OBS (Organization Breakdown Structure), and the RBS (Resource Breakdown Structure). However, these are anything but standard. In an attempt to expand upon the hierarchical capabilities of the software, and to create some standard terminology, the market has produced a set of new terms and formats.
![wbs chart pro mega wbs chart pro mega](https://img.p30download.ir/software/screenshot/2017/02/1487503295_wbs-chart-pro_4.png)
Lately, however, some confusion may be creeping into the scene. Not to worry! Many of the mid- and high-end project management packages (and one low-end Project Scheduler 5) provide multiple code fields for this multiple outline function. So, you can see that a single outline may not do the job for everyone. The corporate comptroller may wish to segment and interrogate the data based on a code of accounts. A functional manager is often more interested in an outline that reflects the organizational structure, such as division, department, section, discipline, etc. For instance, the project manager may wish to view the project using a work breakdown based on the phases of the project, or geographical divisions, or perhaps deliverables. The biggest constraint is that the outline provides only one project hierarchy, when there may be several. This provides a practical and very readable method of defining and displaying a hierarchical relationship of individual tasks within a larger project (and everyone knows what an outline is). OUTLINES AND OTHER FRAMEWORKSįearing that many of us need something more simple and visual (than WBS, etc.), several project management software developers, especially at the lowend, focus on an Outline mode. To ferret out the perpetrators of these dastardly crimes, we have summoned the PM Software Forum Weebis Patrol. Using WBS codes for sorting and selecting (filters) does not constitute a WBS function.
#Wbs chart pro mega full#
Any full function WBS (or OBS or RBS) must be able to facilitate data summarization and reporting by these codes, to any level. For instance, the availability of a data field that contains an activity tag number called “WBS,” does not mean that the product has a true WBS capability. In other, more deleterious cases, the misuse of the terms will make it appear that the product has capabilities that are not present. In this latter situation, is it unproductive, unfair and unethical to misuse a common term for something other than its common understanding? In some cases, this deviation may primarily be a careless application of the wrong term or willingness to stray from the traditional concept.
![wbs chart pro mega wbs chart pro mega](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/323907902_Smart_construction_site_in_mega_construction_projects_A_case_study_on_island_tunneling_project_of_Hong_Kong-Zhuhai-Macao_Bridge/links/5f28e95b92851cd302d85dfe/largepreview.png)
New terms are being introduced to replace the basic three, and even worse, these basic terms are being applied to functions that differ from the traditional concepts. The truth is that these terms, as being applied via popular project management software packages, are being bastardized.
![wbs chart pro mega wbs chart pro mega](http://iranmohandes.com/Content/images/DynamicNews/418b2e7b-4499-464c-9501-8e86cbc4434e.jpg)
In project management, we have the WBS, OBS, and RBS, which, of course, everyone clearly understands. Every discipline has its alphabet soup… abbreviations or acronyms for seemingly non-mistakable terms and functions.